<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The Regulatory Desk</title>
    <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://theregulatorydesk.org/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Independent notes on how health products, clinic tools and patient rules are actually policed. Every note is built from a public record and links its primary source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>The Regulatory Desk</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title>BlephEx, LLC: unresolved FDA warning letter</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-725861.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-725861.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>FDA</category>
      <description>FDA warning letter CMS 725861, issued to BlephEx, LLC on June 3, 2026: three eyelid devices, 177-plus complaints, and a repeat finding from a 2019 inspection.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A randomised trial of the eyelid device found no benefit over sham</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-blephex-trial-2024.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-blephex-trial-2024.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Devices &amp; drugs</category>
      <description>A double-masked randomised trial of 42 patients, published in BMC Ophthalmology in 2024, found no significant difference between BlephEx treatment and sham.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Repeat FDA warning: mold on sterile multi-use drug caps</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-726714.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-726714.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Devices &amp; drugs</category>
      <description>FDA warning letter CMS 726714 to Excelvision–Fareva, June 25, 2026: mold on sterile multi-use caps, recurring CGMP failures, and Import Alert 66-40.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nihon Kohden added alarm-silence after clearance, with no new 510(k)</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-727803.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-727803.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Clinic software</category>
      <description>FDA warning letter CMS 727803 to Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions, June 12, 2026: an alarm-silence feature added after clearance, with no new 510(k).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3B Medical labeled a sleep device for reuse it was never cleared for</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-725108.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-725108.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Devices &amp; drugs</category>
      <description>FDA warning letter CMS 725108 to 3B Medical dba Reach Health, May 20, 2026: an APAP labelled for multi-patient reuse, and cloud software on a 2016 risk file.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ZOLL under FDA warning for a nine-month-late device report</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-711320.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-711320.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>FDA</category>
      <description>FDA warning letter CMS 711320 to ZOLL Medical, April 30, 2026: defibrillators and MRI ventilators, complaints closed as user error, a report filed months late.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Abbott shipped Libre 3 without the accuracy test FDA required</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-722046.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-722046.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>FDA</category>
      <description>FDA warning letter CMS 722046 to Abbott Diabetes Care, January 23, 2026: finished-device accuracy testing skipped after assembly, sterilisation and packing.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vohra paid $45 million after an EMR billed every debridement as surgery</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-vohra-2025.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-vohra-2025.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Clinic software</category>
      <description>A Justice Department settlement of November 21, 2025: Vohra Wound Physicians paid $45 million over allegations its EMR billed every debridement as surgery.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diowave sold a “healing beam” outside the exemption FDA named</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-712715.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/letter-712715.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Devices &amp; drugs</category>
      <description>FDA warning letter CMS 712715 to Technological Medical Advancements, September 26, 2025: claims beyond the infrared-lamp exemption and no design-history file.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FDA: stop using unauthorized blood-pressure wearables</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-bp-unauthorized-2025.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-bp-unauthorized-2025.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Advocacy</category>
      <description>FDA’s safety communication of September 16, 2025: do not use smartwatch or ring features that claim to measure blood pressure without FDA authorization.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Practice Fusion sold opioid alerts, then paid $145 million</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-practice-fusion-2020.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-practice-fusion-2020.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Clinic software</category>
      <description>A Justice Department resolution of January 27, 2020: an electronic health record vendor paid $145 million for selling clinical alerts to an opioid maker.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The malpractice file you can download — and the one you cannot</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-npdb-public.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-npdb-public.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Malpractice</category>
      <description>The National Practitioner Data Bank publishes malpractice payments as statistics, with names stripped by statute. It is not a query on a named practitioner.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who has to report a malpractice check</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-npdb-reporting.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-npdb-reporting.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Malpractice</category>
      <description>Under Title IV, a payer reports a malpractice payment made for the benefit of a practitioner. An FDA warning letter to a manufacturer does not start that clock.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where a warning letter goes after FDA posts it</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-letter-travels.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-letter-travels.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Malpractice</category>
      <description>Federal contracting decisions and export certificates may follow an FDA warning letter. A finding about a clinic’s day-to-day practice does not follow from it.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 483 you can read — and the reply you usually cannot</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-foia-reading-room.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-foia-reading-room.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Advocacy</category>
      <description>FDA’s inspection observations are posted in the OII electronic reading room. The firm’s written reply usually is not, unless someone files a FOIA request.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>177 complaints at FDA, none in the firm’s own file</title>
      <link>https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-medwatch.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://theregulatorydesk.org/note-medwatch.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Advocacy</category>
      <description>Anyone can report a device problem to FDA through MedWatch. Warning letter 725861 shows what the record looks like when a firm’s own complaint file was empty.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
